Study • Health · Healthcare Consumption
Effects of Framing and Level of Probability on Patients’ Preferences for Cancer Chemotherapy.
O’Connor (1988), “Effects of Framing and Level of Probability on Patients’ Preferences for Cancer Chemotherapy”, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
Summary by Mark Egan
This study looked at probability framings on preferences for cancer treatment alternatives in which tradeoffs between quantity and quality of life are made. 129 healthy volunteers and 154 cancer patients indicated their preferences for a toxic or non-toxic treatment at varying survival probabilities. They were randomly assigned into 3 treatments: (1) a positive frame in which the probability of survival was given; (2) a negative frame in which the probability of dying was given; and (3) a mixed frame in which the probability of surviving and dying were both given.The cancer patients' preferences for the more effective toxic treatment was significantly stronger than the healthy volunteers. Both groups were significantly influenced by the level of probability that was presented. Preferences for the toxic treatment were weaker when the chance of survival dropped below 50%. This weakening preference below 50% survival was enhanced for subjects who responded in the negative frame. A negative frame or probability level below 0.5 seems to stimulate a "dying mode" type of value system in which quality, not quantity, of life becomes more salient in decision making.
Tactics used
TACTICS
Framing Effects
Behaviors addressed
Similar studies
Health · Diet & Nutrition
Schwartz et al. (2012). Inviting Consumers to Downsize Fast-Food Portions Significantly Reduces Calorie Consumption.
- Tactics
- Reminders, Cues, & Triggers
- Behaviors
- Diet & Nutrition
Finance · Fine or Debt Collection
Fellner et al. (2011). Testing Enforcement Strategies in the Field -Threat, Moral Appeal and Social Information.
- Tactics
- Social Norms, Reminders, Cues, & Triggers
- Behaviors
- Fine or Debt Collection
Finance · Other, Financial Behaviors
Letzler & Tasoff (2013). Everyone Believes in Redemption
- Tactics
- Reduce Friction or Barriers, Reminders, Cues, & Triggers, Implementation Intentions
- Behaviors
- Other, Financial Behaviors
Finance · Savings
Karlan et al. (2010). Getting to the Top of Mind: How Reminders Increase Saving.
- Tactics
- Reminders, Cues, & Triggers, Micro-Incentives, Goal Setting, Commitment Devices
- Behaviors
- Savings